Drawing for FIBRE FRESH

USPTO serial 76354860

FIBRE FRESH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JOHNSON, AISHA CLARKE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FIBRE FRESH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Edward J. Kondracki

EDWARD J KONDRACKI MILES & STOCKBRIDGE1751 PINNACLE DR STE 500MCLEAN, VA 22102UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Antibacterial, antimicrobial and antifugal solutions for use in the manufacture of textilesACTIVE—
003Antibacterial, antimicrobial and antifungal solutions for treating textilesACTIVE—
024Finished textile fabrics other than floor coverings for use in the manufacture of carpets and rugs; in upholstery, including pillows, seating and similar products; in draperies; in bedding, including mattresses, pillows, pillow shams, blankets, comforters and similar products; in the manufacture of industrial fabrics such as tent fabrics, tarpaulins, storage coveres, including boat covers, and similar productsACTIVE—
027textile floor coveringsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 22, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 22, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 9, 2003EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Sep 21, 2003ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 18, 2003CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jun 19, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 19, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 10, 2003EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Nov 20, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 26, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 26, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 3, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 21, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance