USPTO serial 76354983
MIRACLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHARPER JR, SAM
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MIRACLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Roger W. Parkhurst
TIMOTHY M KENNY Seyfarth Shaw LLP1075 Peachtree St. NESte 2500Atlanta, GA 30309-3958Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 040 | vapor deposition of metal and ceramic; metal electroplating; processing of metal materials, namely, milling, annealing, tempering, hot dipping; providing information on material processing; molding, grinding, cutting and surface coating of metal materials, ceramics, and metal and ceramic products; coating metal and ceramic cutting tools | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 15, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 15, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 18, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 18, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 29, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 24, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 30, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 12, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 30, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 29, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 20, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 22, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 24, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 10, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 18, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 26, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 9, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 6, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 12, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |