Drawing for THEPORT

USPTO serial 76355124

THEPORT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LE, KHANH M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THEPORT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Elisabeth A. Langworthy

ELISABETH A. LANGWORTHY SUTHERLAND, ASBILL & BRENNAN LLP1275 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NW STE 1WASHINGTON, DC 20004-2415UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable computer communications software for electronically transmitting messages and data in a bi-directional interactive manner between private computer desktopsACTIVE—
038Communications services, namely, bi-directional interactive transmission of voice, data, images, text, and audio via a global computer network; Providing bi-directional interactive communications channel between organizations and end-users in the nature of a bulletin board which enable such organizations and end-users to transmit digital multimedia content between web-connected devices such as computers, cell phones, hand-held devices and Internet appliances for use in information exchange, customized marketing, consumer relationship management and web site/web services developmentACTIVE—
042Managed Service Provider(MSP) services featuring a suite of web-based computer software applications that provide organizations with the means by which to deliver digital multimedia content between web-connected devices such as computers, cell phones, hand-held devices and Internet appliances for use in information exchange, customized marketing, consumer relationship management and web site/web services developmentACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 28, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 28, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 27, 2010NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 1, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 12, 2010NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 23, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 23, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 2, 2010RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Apr 2, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 2, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 1, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 1, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 1, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 1, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 1, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 1, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 30, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 30, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 13, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 14, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 8, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 13, 2004UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 26, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 3, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 27, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Nov 12, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 1, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Oct 31, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 10, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 3, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 24, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 16, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance