Drawing for COMBIWICK

USPTO serial 76355130

COMBIWICK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FAINT, MARY CATHERINE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COMBIWICK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey P. Thennisch

JEFFREY P THENNISCH DOBRUSIN & THENNISCH PC29 W LAWRENCE STE 210PONTIAC, MI 48342UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Scientific Equipment Devices And Tools; Namely, Scientific Research, Testing, And Absorption Equipment Comprised Of computer Hardware, Computer Software, And Laboratory Research Tools Used In The Field of Chemical And Materials Research And Development Primarily In Chemical And Electronic Applications, Namely, Combinatorial And High Throughput Methods Of Materials Research And Development, Namely, Scanning Mass Spectrometers, Photothermal Deflection Apparatus, Vapor Deposition Apparatus, Rapid Fire Light Scattering Apparatus, High Throughput Characterization Equipment, Namely, Polymer Characterization Apparatus, Calorimetry Apparatus, Rheology Apparatus, Mechanical Property Testing Apparatus, And Screening Apparatus For Catalysts And Polymers, And Software For Controlling The Operation And Function Of The Aforementioned Research Equipment In The Field Of Chemical, Pharmaceutical, Agrochemical And Materials Research, Scientific Property Testing And Analysis, And Combinatorial Materials Science ResearchACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 15, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 4, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 5, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 13, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 23, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 13, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 21, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 2, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 2, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 24, 2002CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Nov 6, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 27, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 24, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 18, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 18, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 18, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 15, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 16, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance