USPTO serial 76355141
NEW YORK LOCK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICHELI, ANGELA M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NEW YORK LOCK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DYANN L KOSTELLO
DYANN L KOSTELLO MICHAEL BEST & FRIEDRICH LLP3773 CORPORATE PKWY STE 360CENTER VALLEY, PA 18034UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Security products, namely, computer hardware; security casings and anchoring pads for computer hardware; products that provide secure communications on a global computer communication network and local area networks, namely computer software and accompanying user manuals for use with encryption, user verification and authentication, and for protection against virus, intrusion and other security risks; firewall and fingerprint authentication applications; encoded smart cards containing programming used to generate and verify user passwords, identity or access; pattern recognition software; network monitoring software; computer software in the field of security firewall; hardware, software and firmware for biometric recognition, identification and authentication | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 19, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 17, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 8, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 8, 2003 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2003 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 25, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 22, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 21, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 16, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |