Drawing for CHAINPLANET

USPTO serial 76355451

CHAINPLANET

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BROWN, BRIAN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CHAINPLANET?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

S. Daniel Harbottle

S DANIEL HARBOTTLE RUTAN & TUCKER, LLP611 ANTON BLVD STE 1400COSTA MESA, CA 92626UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business consultation, namely, providing consultation, business planning, business research and information on starting and maintaining a successful business in the field of hair care, nail care, skin care, cosmetics, and spas, and excluding contingency planning, computer disaster recover planning and business continuity planning services; consultation in the field of business acquisitions excluding contingency planning, computer disaster recover planning and business continuity planning services; franchising, namely, offering technical assistance in the establishment and/or operation of hair care salons, nail care salons, skin care salons, cosmetic stores, and spas excluding contingency planning, computer disaster recover planning and business continuity planning servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 29, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 26, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Oct 21, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 29, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 9, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 23, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 9, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 9, 2003TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 9, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 3, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 3, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 26, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 22, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance