Drawing for RED HOT EURO

USPTO serial 76355505

RED HOT EURO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PINO, BRIAN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RED HOT EURO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lucy B. Arant

LUCY B ARANT RUSS, AUGUST, KABAT & KENT12424 WILSHIRE BLVD12TH'FLOORLOS ANGELES, CA 90025

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009RECORDED PROGRAMMES FOR TELEVISION AND THE INTERNET CONTAINING ADULT MATERIAL, VIDEO CASSETTES BEARING ADULT MATERIAL PRE-RECORDED VIDEO CASSETTES, VIDEO COMPACT DISCS,ACTIVE—
038SATELLITE SERVICES BROADCASTING SERVICES AND COMMUNICATION SERVICES FOR TELEVISION AND THE INTERNET-- BROADCASTING AND TRANSMISSION OF TELEVISION PROGRAMMES, BROADCASTING AND TRANSMISSION OF CABLE TELEVISION PROGRAMMES BROADCASTING AND TRANSMISSION OF TELEVISION PROGRAMMES BY SATELLITE,ACTIVE—
041ENTERTAINMENT AND AMUSEMENT SUCH AS BY PAY TELEVISION SATELLITE TELEVISION CABLE TELEVISION AND THE INTERNET; PRODUCTION OF FILMS AND VIDEOS; PRODUCTION OF TELEVISION AND VIDEO PROGRAMMES; PRODUCTION OF SHOWS FOR CABLE SATELLITE THE INTERNET PAY AND FREE TELEVISION,ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 28, 2003PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Apr 14, 2003PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Apr 14, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 31, 2002ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 25, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 23, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 17, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance