USPTO serial 76355508
JUICY BABY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHHINA, KARANENDRA S
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with JUICY BABY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
WILLIAM J. SPATZ
GENE BOLMARCICH LIZ CLAIBORNE INCHQ2 7TH FL1 CLAIBORNE AVENORTH BERGEN, NJ 07047Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, namely, shirts, blouses, T-shirts, pants, shorts, overalls, shortalls, creepers, sweatshirts, jackets, coats, skirts, dresses, jumpsuits, jumpers, tops, sweaters, vests, headwear, hats, caps, mittens, parkas, raincoats, underwear, night gowns, pajamas, robes, cloth baby bibs, baby bunting, infant wear, swim wear, beach wear, beach cover ups; accessories, namely, gloves, mittens, scarves, belts; leotards, socks, booties and footwear | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Travis Jeans, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Travis Jeans, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by L.C. LICENSING, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named JUICY BABY
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 12, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 12, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 9, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 4, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 4, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 13, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 11, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 11, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 11, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 12, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 4, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 27, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 20, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 10, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 11, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 19, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 30, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 12, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 12, 2003 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2003 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 13, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 23, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 13, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |