USPTO serial 76355577
THE LAST BEST PLACE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MULLEN, MARK
- Law office
- OFFICE OF TRADEMARK PROGRAM CONTROL
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THE LAST BEST PLACE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LUKE W. DEMARTE
SUZANNE L SAXMAN SEYFARTH SHAW LLP131 S DEARBORN ST STE 2400CHICAGO, IL 60603UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 043 | hotel and lodge services, namely, providing lodging and restaurant services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 26, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 26, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 4, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 2012 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 2012 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 2, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 2, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 2, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 2, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 2, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 2, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 2, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 29, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 16, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 16, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 16, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 16, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 3, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 20, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 6, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 6, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 31, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 18, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 18, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 11, 2006 | CRTP | REG. CANCELLED - RESTORED TO PENDENCY | — |
| Nov 22, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 20, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 4, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 16, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 15, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 15, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 9, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2005 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Aug 19, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 4, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 1, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 29, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 28, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 25, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 22, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 8, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 14, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 14, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 22, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 22, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 17, 2004 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 24, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 26, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 10, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 20, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 31, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 26, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 16, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 5, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 22, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |