USPTO serial 76356163
ULTIMATE FIGHTING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AWRICH, ELLEN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ULTIMATE FIGHTING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Las Vegas, NV
Las Vegas, NV
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Parker H. Bagley, Esq
PARKER H BAGLEY ESQ MILBANK, TWEED, HADLEY & MCCLOY LLP1 CHASE MANHATTAN PLZNEW YORK, NY 10005-1413UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Pre-recorded audio cassettes, phonograph records, motion picture films featuring sports events, mixed martial arts and profiles of athletes; eyeglasses; sunglasses | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | (Based on Intent to Use) Warm-up suits, sweatpants; polo shirts; golf shirts; sports shirts; vests; pants for babies; baby booties; belts; neckties; suspenders; bandanas; beach sandals; infant and toddler sleepwear; robes; nightshirts and night gowns; pajamas and loungewear; bathing suits; beachwear, namely cover-ups; diaper sets, namely undergarments for infants; toddler short sets; jogging suits; rompers; boys short sets; socks; play suits, namely a children's play outfit consisting of a blouse and shorts; coveralls; union suits; henley suits; skirts; blouses; pants; slacks; shirts; jackets; referees and umpires uniforms; athletic uniforms; team uniform reproductions, namely jerseys featuring reproductions of professional athletic team logos; sweaters; parkas; turtlenecks; mittens and gloves; jerseys; bow ties; headwear and scarves; ear muffs; head bands, namely bands worn around the head; hosiery; rainwear, namely rain ponchos and jackets; footwear, namely shoes, boots slippers and bath thongs; namely visors; aprons; cloth baby and ski bibs; canvas footwear; knickers; wind resistant jackets; Halloween and masquerade costumes; blazers; leg warmers, namely knitted coverings for the legs; jeans; leotards; workout and sports apparel, namely jackets, slacks | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Rubber balls; action figures and accessories; bean bag dolls; plush toys; balloons; golf balls; tennis balls; bath toys; Christmas tree ornaments; board games; building blocks; equipment sold as a unit for playing card games; dolls and doll clothing; doll play sets; children's play cosmetics; crib toys; electric action toys; manipulative games; golf gloves; golf ball markers; jigsaw puzzles; kites; mobiles; music box toys; party favors in the nature of small toys; inflatable pool toys; multiple activity toys; wind-up toys; target games; disc-type toss toys; bows and arrows; toy vehicles; toy cars; toy trucks; toy bucket and shovel sets; roller skates; toy model hobby craft kits; toy rockets; toy guns; toy holsters; musical toys; badminton sets; bubble making wands and solution sets; toy figurines; toy banks; puppets; yo-yos; skateboards; scooters; face masks; hand-held electronic game units; and playing cards | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 8, 2019 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 3, 2017 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2017 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 24, 2016 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 27, 2016 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 7, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 7, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 6, 2007 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 6, 2007 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 25, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 25, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 14, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 3, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 3, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 18, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 18, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 17, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 17, 2004 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 24, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 23, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2004 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 14, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 24, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 1, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 12, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 17, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 5, 2004 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 11, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2003 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 31, 2003 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 8, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 5, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 5, 2003 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 5, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 4, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 12, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 18, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 23, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 16, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 12, 2002 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 8, 2002 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 8, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |