USPTO serial 76356184
CBI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JENKINS JR, CHARLES L
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CBI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard M. LaBarge
RICHARD M LABARGE MARSHALL, CERSTEIN & BORUN6300 SEARS TWR233 S WACKER DRCHICAGO, IL 60606-6357Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | construction, maintenance and repair of commercial and industrial storage and processing spheres, terminals, towers and tanks; construction management supervision | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 9, 2006 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Feb 13, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 1, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 9, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 17, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 17, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 30, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 13, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 13, 2004 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Feb 13, 2004 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 2004 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Feb 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 15, 2004 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 3, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 30, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 24, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 29, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 13, 2003 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Jul 18, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 22, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 8, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 8, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 3, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |