USPTO serial 76357153
PULMITECT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JENKINS JR, CHARLES L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PULMITECT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William F. Lawrence, Esq.
WILLIAM F LAWRENCE ESQ FROMMER LAWRENCE & HAUG LLP745 FIFTH AVENEW YORK, NY 10151UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Pharmaceutical preparations, namely, peptides for use in the localization and detection of pulmonary emboli, | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 18, 2006 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 23, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 22, 2006 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 22, 2006 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jun 14, 2005 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 12, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 12, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 10, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 5, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 4, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 6, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 20, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 15, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 17, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 28, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 28, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 28, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |