USPTO serial 76357438
ECLIPSE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 18, 2006
- Examiner
- RIRIE, VERNA BETH
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ECLIPSE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Newark, DE
CLEVELAND, OH
M. A. Bruder & Sons, Incorporated
Broomall, PA
M. A. Bruder & Sons, Incorporated
Broomall, PA
M. A. Bruder & Sons, Incorporated
Broomall, PA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Frank P. Presta
ROBERT E. MCDONALD101 PROSPECT AVE, N.W1100 MIDLAND BLDG-LEGAL DEPARTMENTCLEVELAND, OH 44115-1075Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 002 | INTERIOR WALL PAINTS AND EXTERIOR HOUSE PAINTS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 1, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SWIMC, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by THE SHERWIN-WILLIAMS COMPANY
- Other trademarks owned by M. A. Bruder & Sons, Incorporated
- Other trademarks owned by M. A. Bruder & Sons, Incorporated
- Other trademarks owned by M. A. Bruder & Sons, Incorporated
- Other trademarks in Class 002
- Similar marks named ECLIPSE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 23, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 12, 2009 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Nov 12, 2009 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 23, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 23, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 18, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 24, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 4, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 12, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 9, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 8, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 16, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 3, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 3, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 11, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 10, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 18, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 29, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 17, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 17, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 11, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 20, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2002 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 12, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 22, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 3, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 20, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |