Drawing for UNBREAKABLE PAD LOCK

USPTO serial 76357601

UNBREAKABLE PAD LOCK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BAIRD, MICHAEL
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - SENIOR ATTORNEY

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with UNBREAKABLE PAD LOCK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Scott J. Fields

SCOTT J FIELDS NATIONAL IP RIGHTS CENTER LLC550 TOWNSHIP LINE RD STE 400BLUE BELL, PA 19422UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006pad locksACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 1, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 1, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 10, 2005MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 2, 2005ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 2, 2005EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 23, 2004CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Dec 22, 2004CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Oct 26, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 26, 2004JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 14, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 6, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 5, 2004RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Oct 5, 2004CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Oct 4, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 12, 2004RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Jun 14, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 10, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 10, 2004JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 9, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Nov 10, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 7, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 3, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 29, 2003RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Jul 11, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 11, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 2, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 27, 2003EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 16, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 16, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 12, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 28, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 28, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 25, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 25, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 10, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 2, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 2, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance