USPTO serial 76357614
UNBREAKABLE HITCH LOCK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BAIRD, MICHAEL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with UNBREAKABLE HITCH LOCK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scott J. Fields
SCOTT J FIELDS NATIONAL IP RIGHTS CENTER LLC550 TOWNSHIP LINE RD STE 400BLUE BELL, PA 19422UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | security devices, namely, metal anti-theft locks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 1, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 1, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 1, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 1, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 28, 2004 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 27, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 27, 2004 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Feb 26, 2004 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 22, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 5, 2003 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 29, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 1, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 27, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 16, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 16, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 12, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 28, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 28, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 25, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 25, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 2, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 2, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |