USPTO serial 76357691
FIT FEET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- POWELL, LINDA
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FIT FEET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Mill Valley, CA
Mill Valley, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Exercise weights used in conjunction with footwear for exercise, training and conditioning | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 6, 2005 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Jun 1, 2005 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 27, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 27, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 19, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 3, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 27, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 29, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 5, 2004 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Jan 5, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 15, 2003 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 26, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 14, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 9, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 19, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 27, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 7, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 30, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 28, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 25, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |