USPTO serial 76358065
NODE B VIRTUAL MACHINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AIKENS, RONALD E
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NODE B VIRTUAL MACHINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew J. Gray IV
ANDREW J GRAY IV PENNIE & EDMONDS LLP3300 HILLVIEW AVEPALO ALTO, CA 94304UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | INTEGRATED CIRCUITS AND INTEGRATED CIRCUIT CORES FOR USE IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS AND WIRELESS COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT AND APPARATUS AND DIGITAL SIGNAL PROCESSORS (DSP) DESIGN FOR OTHERS OF INTEGRATED CIRCUITS AND INTEGRATED CIRCUIT CORES FOR USE IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS AND WIRELESS COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT AND APPARATUS AND DIGITAL SIGNAL PROCESSORS (DSP) | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 22, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 21, 2003 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 5, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 12, 2003 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 1, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 29, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 25, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 7, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 7, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 2, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 20, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 5, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 4, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 30, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 29, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |