USPTO serial 76358107
AIRSTREAM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AYALA, LOURDES
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AIRSTREAM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Imlay City, MI
Imlay City, MI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
B JOSEPH SCHAEFF
B JOSEPH SCHAEFF DINSMORE & SHOHL LLP1 S MAIN ST STE 1300ONE DAYTON CTRDAYTON, OH 45402-2023Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | Home furniture, namely, living room furniture, armchairs, bar stools, dining chairs, footstools, love seats, ottomans, recliners, rocking chairs, settees and sofas; tables, namely, coffee tables, end tables, side tables, kitchen tables, dining room tables and tea cans; cabinets and containers, namely, bookcases, furniture cabinets, furniture chests, chests of drawers, credenzas, TV cabinets, magazine racks and umbrella stands; room dividers for homes, namely, partitions and screens; bedroom furniture, namely bed frames and headboards | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 29, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 29, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 14, 2008 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 2, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 29, 2008 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 3, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 29, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | IROA | RESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 27, 2007 | INCE | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| May 31, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 29, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 1, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 25, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 1, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 29, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 6, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 17, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 11, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 27, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 16, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 4, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 4, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 30, 2005 | CEPE | COMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 18, 2005 | CEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2005 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 18, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 3, 2004 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 3, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 26, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 9, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 8, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 8, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 6, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 30, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |