USPTO serial 76358239
BRAVANTA 3D METHODOLOGY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AMOS, TANYA L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BRAVANTA 3D METHODOLOGY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Erin M. Clarke, Esq.
ERIN M CLARKE ESQ OWEN, WICKERSHAM & ERICKSON, PC455 MARKET ST STE 1910SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | BUSINESS CONSULTATION SERVICES SPECIALIZING IN THE CUSTOM DESIGN OF BUSINESS PERFORMANCE SOLUTIONS FOR OTHERS, NAMELY, EMPLOYEE AND CUSTOMER INCENTIVE AND RECOGNITION PROGRAMS AND CUSTOMER LOYALTY PROGRAMS, PROVIDED VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK | ACTIVE | Jun 30, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 21, 2002 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 16, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 11, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |