USPTO serial 76358477
SCHYMURA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MACIOL II, EUGENE VALENTINE-JO
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SCHYMURA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DWIGHT E. COLE
MARK TUCKER, INC1 PENN PLZ STE 1602NEW YORK, NY 10119-1602UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | Baby backpacks, athletic bags, beach bags, attache cases, call purpose sport bags, book bags, bostor bags, carry-on bags, clutch bags, diaper bags, duffel bags, gym bags, overnight bags, leather and mesh shopping bags, school bags, shoulder bags, tote bags, travel bags, garment bags for travel, briefcases, hange purses, coin purses, fanny packs, felt pouches, handbags, key cries, knapsacks, luggage, waist packs, pocketbooks, briefcase type portfolios, drawstring pouches, felt pouches, purses, valises, wallets | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Mens, womens and childrens footwear of every type including-- dress shoes, work shoes, after ski boots, athletic footwear, athletic shoes, booties, boots, hiking boots, golf shoes, pumps, thongs, sandals | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 20, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 18, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 29, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |