Drawing for HYDRO-CIRCULATOR

USPTO serial 76358613

HYDRO-CIRCULATOR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
REIHNER, DAVID
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HYDRO-CIRCULATOR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ERIC S. HYMAN

ERIC S HYMAN BLAKELY SOKOLOFF TAYLOR & ZAFMAN12400 WILSHIRE BLVD SEVENTH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90025UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003cosmetics, namely, skin cleansing creams, skin cleansing gels, skin cleansing lotions, facial masks, makeup removers, body lotions, face lotions, face creams, face powders, eye creams, moisturizers, exfoliative creams, facial massage oils, sun damage repair creams, sunscreens, cosmetic astringents, perfumes and skin soapsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 7, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 7, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 20, 2005EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Apr 28, 2005EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Apr 28, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 22, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Nov 22, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Nov 22, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 9, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
May 27, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 24, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 24, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jan 16, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 8, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 3, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 27, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 2, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 2, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 3, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 10, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 21, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 17, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 11, 2002CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
May 7, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 1, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance