Drawing for BOTTOM LINE HOW TO SERIES

USPTO serial 76358748

BOTTOM LINE HOW TO SERIES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STRZYZ, KAREN
Law office
INTENT TO USE UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BOTTOM LINE HOW TO SERIES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

KAREN ARTZ ASH

KAREN ARTZ ASH KATTEN MUCHIN ZAVIS ROSENMAN575 MADISON AVE FL 26NEW YORK, NY 10022-2585UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Publications, namely a series of self help books and newsletters on the subject of personal, lifestyle, self improvement, health, nutrition, fitness, life, family, money, financial and business issuesACTIVE—
041Providing on-line, non-downloadable self help books and newsletters in the field of personal, lifestyle, self-improvement, health, nutrition, fitness, life, family, money, financial, and business issuesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 12, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 12, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 7, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 25, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 25, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 25, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 12, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 27, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 27, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 26, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 3, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 14, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 2, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 24, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 19, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 19, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 4, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 30, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 29, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 26, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 6, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 5, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance