Drawing for SAHARA SAND

USPTO serial 76359028

SAHARA SAND

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BROWN, BRIAN
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SAHARA SAND?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kenneth A. Clark

KENNETH A CLARK RANKIN, HILL, PORTER & CLARK LLP925 EUCLID AVE STE 700CLEVELAND, OH 44115-1405UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Drying agent used in the manufacture of road and traffic marking paint, and during the formation of markings on roadwaysACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 27, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 27, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 4, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 10, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 21, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 24, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 24, 2003ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Oct 24, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 21, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Oct 16, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 15, 2003EXPREX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED—
Aug 20, 2003CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jun 26, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 13, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 13, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 7, 2003EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Oct 16, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 11, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 11, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 23, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 10, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 2, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 27, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 27, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance