Drawing for AIRMARK

USPTO serial 76359352

AIRMARK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CORDOVA, RAUL
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AIRMARK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Philip R. Bautista

PHILIP R BAUTISTA KAHN KLEINMAN2600 ERIEVIEW TWR 1301 E 9TH STCLEVELAND, OH 44114UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011HIGH FILTRATION PORTABLE ROOM AIR CLEANERSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 6, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 6, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 17, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 17, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 13, 2005EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Mar 21, 2005EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Mar 21, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 27, 2004ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 27, 2004REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 27, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 16, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Sep 1, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Sep 1, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 30, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
May 27, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 26, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 24, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Mar 24, 2004REINREINSTATED—
Mar 23, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 19, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Feb 19, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 6, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 20, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jan 8, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Dec 17, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 10, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 10, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 15, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 27, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 5, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 5, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 5, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 1, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 9, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 19, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 16, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 2, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance