Drawing for GLOBAL POINTS XCHANGE

USPTO serial 76359741

GLOBAL POINTS XCHANGE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BELENKER, ESTHER
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GLOBAL POINTS XCHANGE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thad N. Leach

THAD N LEACH BOX IP DEPTLEWIS, RICE & FINGERSH, L C500 N BROADWAY STE 2000ST LOUIS, MO 63102

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Providing a web site on the global computer network for the tracking and redemption of customer loyalty rewardsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 12, 2006MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 12, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 8, 2005ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 7, 2005EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 28, 2005EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Mar 24, 2005GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 24, 2005CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Jan 26, 2005JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 24, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 24, 2004EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 16, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 12, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 19, 2004GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 14, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jan 2, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 2, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 1, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 20, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 14, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 14, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 24, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 24, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 24, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 2, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 19, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 19, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance