USPTO serial 76359788
PARADISE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SINGH, TEJBIR
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PARADISE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Eric Weinstein
ERIC WEINSTEIN FELDMAN WEINSTEIN LLP36 W 44TH ST STE 1201NEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Processed olives; processed cherries, namely, processed maraschino cherries and processed green maraschino cherries; processed peppers, namely, processed jalapeno peppers; processed giardiniera; processed fruit, namely, processed kumquats | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 1995 |
| 030 | Capers, namely, processed nonpareil capers and processed imported capers; processed salsa; processed sauces; condiments, namely, pickled ginger and pimiento | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 2006 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jun 14, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 2, 2006 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Jun 2, 2006 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Aug 11, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 6, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 6, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 2, 2004 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jun 21, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 17, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 6, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 9, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 16, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 16, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |