USPTO serial 76359821
AURORA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PAPPAS, MATTHEW
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AURORA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Havant, Hants PO9 2NL, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William D. O'Neill
WILLIAM D O'NEILL SENNIGER, POWERS, LEAVITT & ROEDELONE METROPOLITAN SQ 16TH FLST LOUIS, MO 63102UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machines to deposit by a high vacuum sputtering technique a thin layer of material sputtered from a target on a substrate, in the field of precision film deposition; precision thin film deposition machines to deposit a thin layer of material sputtered from a target on an optically transparent substrate, in the field of precision film deposition; machines to build multi-layer optical filters, in the field of precision film deposition; machines to build gain flattening, add/drop multiplexers, in the field of precision film deposition; machines to build multi-dielectric narrow band optical filters for dense wavelength division multiplexing applications, in the field of precision film deposition; vacuum pumps for use in apparatus for vacuum deposition of optical coatings on substrates, parts for all the aforementioned goods | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Scientific apparatus incorporating a vacuum chamber for use in vacuum deposition of an optical coating on a substrate using a vacuum sputtering technique; electronic apparatus to generate and control a gas plasma in the manufacture by vacuum deposition of devices incorporating an optical coating; electronic apparatus, namely laser optical monitors for use in the manufacture by vacuum deposition of multi-layer filters; ion beam sources for use in vacuum sputtering apparatus; scientific apparatus to bombard a target with ions from a broad beam ion source to eject material from the target; vacuum sputtering apparatus, namely, thin film deposition units; computers and computer programs to control a vacuum sputtering process in the production of optical networking components; current neutralizers for neutralizing ion beams from ion beam sources in vacuum sputtering apparatus; electronic power supply devices; gas metering devices, namely, gas meters and gas gauges for use in vacuum sputtering apparatus during deposition of optical coatings on substrates; vacuum measurement devices, namely vacuum gauges for use in vacuum sputtering apparatus for use in vacuum deposition of optical coatings on a substrate; and parts for all the aforementioned goods | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 16, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 26, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 2, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 28, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 28, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 24, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 25, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 3, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |