USPTO serial 76360035
PRESENCE NOT APPEARANCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WAHLBERG, STACY B
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PRESENCE NOT APPEARANCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JEFFREY PERVANAS
JEFFREY PERVANAS RICHES, MCKENZIE & HERBERT LLP2 BLOOR ST E STE 1800TORONTO, ON M4W 3J5CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | video conferencing apparatus consisting of a video monitor, microphones, video cameras and computer software to facilitate video conferencing; computer hardware and software in the field of telecommunications for facilitating video conferencing; video conferencing equipment; namely video monitor, microphones, video cameras and computer hardware and software to facilitate video conferencing, robots for facilitating video conferencing, position detectors to detect the position of conferees in a room; teleconferencing equipment, namely video monitors, microphones, video cameras and computer hardware and software to facilitate video conferencing, robots for facilitating video conferencing, position detectors to detect the position of conferees in a room; voice response equipment, namely position detector for detecting the position of a conferee, and, computer hardware and software to track the conferee; motion detector software for facilitating video conferencing; robots for facilitating video conferencing; video conferencing system, namely computer hardware and software to facilitate video conferencing, video cameras, audio speakers, video monitors, and input/output devices to control the video camera, audio speakers and video monitors | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 2, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 2, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 7, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 25, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 31, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 9, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 9, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 3, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 18, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 4, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 1, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 21, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 21, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 25, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 24, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 24, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 27, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 4, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 12, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 20, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 18, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 29, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 29, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 25, 2002 | 44DD | SEC. 44(D) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Oct 25, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 25, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 15, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 3, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |