USPTO serial 76360046
DELTA-FLEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2896563Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 26, 2004
- Examiner
- CASE, LEIGH CAROLINE
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DELTA-FLEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
HERDECKE, DE
DORKEN MKS-Systeme GmbH & Co. KG
58313 Herdecke, DE
DORKEN MKS-Systeme GmbH & Co. KG
58313 Herdecke, DE
DORKEN MKS-Systeme GmbH & Co. KG
58313 Herdecke, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nicole M. Meyer
Nicole M. Meyer DICKINSON WRIGHT PLLC1825 Eye Street, N.W., Suite 900WASHINGTON, DC 20006UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 002 | Dyes, paints, lacquers, glazes, varnishes, and oil paints for use on metal parts; [ mordants used for protection against corrosion and as a preservative, wood preservatives, ] coatings for protection against corrosion, and anti-rust preparations in the nature of coatings applied to metal parts | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by EWALD DORKEN AG
- Other trademarks owned by DORKEN MKS-Systeme GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by DORKEN MKS-Systeme GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by DORKEN MKS-Systeme GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks in Class 002
- Similar marks named DELTA-FLEX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 9, 2025 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Oct 26, 2023 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 3, 2014 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2014 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Nov 3, 2014 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Nov 3, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 20, 2014 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| May 25, 2010 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 25, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 10, 2010 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 5, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 26, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 3, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 14, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 28, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 15, 2004 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 6, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 6, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 3, 2004 | 44ED | SEC. 44(E) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jan 16, 2004 | CNRU | DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2004 | AAUD | AMENDMENT OF ALLEGED USE DISAPPROVED | — |
| Jan 2, 2004 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 15, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2003 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 5, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 4, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 29, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 2, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 2, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 11, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 3, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |