USPTO serial 76360122
RED DEVIL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LE, KHANH M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RED DEVIL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Sherman Oaks, CA
Sherman Oaks, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Karin E. Peterka
KARIN E PETERKA BUCHALTER NEMER1000 WILSHIRE BLVD STE 1500LOS ANGELES, CA 90017-2457UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by C SQUARED TV, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by C SQUARED TV, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named RED DEVIL
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 20, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 20, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 21, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 30, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 29, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 2, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 8, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 14, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 29, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 3, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 3, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 14, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 6, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 13, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 8, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 27, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 13, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 14, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 22, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 2, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 21, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 21, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 20, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 23, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 5, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 8, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |