USPTO serial 76360772
DOROTHY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARRUTHERS, SUE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DOROTHY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Janet A. Kobrin, Esq.
JANET A KOBRIN ESQ WARNER BROS4000 WARNER BLVDBRIDGE BLDG 5TH FLBURBANK, CA 91522Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Vegetable juice for beverages; sweet drinks prepared with rice and malt, fruit powder, fruit syrup, concentrated fruit juice; lemonades and syrup for lemonade; cola syrup; powders for effervescing beverages; pastilles for effervescing beverages; non-alcoholic beverages, namely soft drinks, fruit nectars; fruit juices, fruit drinks, fruit flavored soft drinks, fruit punch, seltzer water, soda water, drinking water and sports drinks; preparations for making aerated water and juice; mineral and spring water | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 17, 2002 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 6, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 28, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 29, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 15, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 12, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |