USPTO serial 76360809
BASKETBALL CITY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KAZAZIAN, MICHAEL H
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BASKETBALL CITY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario M6K 3J8, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
M. Stephen Georgas
M STEPHEN GEORGAS MILLER THOMSONBOX 2720 QUEEN ST W STE 2500TORONTO, ON M5H 3S1Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | pre-recorded instructional videotapes, digital video disks, and compact disks related to basketball | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 22, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 20, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 10, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 16, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |