CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for SHIELDALL

USPTO serial 76360858

SHIELDALL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KAZAZIAN, MICHAEL H
Law office
INTENT TO USE UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SHIELDALL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

M. Iris Hess

M IRIS HESS LADAS & PARRY5670 WILSHIRE BLVD21ST FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90036-5679

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009filters against electromagnetic radiation; devices for protecting mobile and cordless telephone users from electromagnetic wave radiation emitted from such equipment; telecommunication apparatus, instruments and systems, namely, mobile telephones, car telephones, cordless telephones and parts and fittings thereofACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 27, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 27, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 14, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 12, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
May 3, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 3, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 10, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 10, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 5, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 6, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 11, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 22, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 11, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 22, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 22, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 14, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 16, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 10, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 1, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance