USPTO serial 76360989
SURE GRIP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CAIN, CATHERINE P
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SURE GRIP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Kamloops, British Columbia, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Susan M. Beliveau
SUSAN M BELIVEAU SUSAN M BELIVEAUSTE 201, 2 3302 30TH AVEVERNON, BC V1T 2C8CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Hand-held encasement controls for operating construction, agriculture, forestry, marine and excavation machinery and equipment, and for computer controls, and sensors and switches contained therein sold as a unit | ACTIVE | Aug 6, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5, 2004 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Nov 5, 2004 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 26, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 26, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 17, 2004 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 26, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 4, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 4, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 10, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 27, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 27, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 26, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 18, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 5, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |