USPTO serial 76360995
CU.P BUMP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLARK, ROBERT C
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CU.P BUMP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence N. Ginsberg
LAWRENCE N GINSBERG21 SAN ANTONIONEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660-9112UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | conductive interconnect components, containing copper, on and extending from, an integrated circuit or semiconductor wafer, flip chip interconnect components, namely, flip chip on lead frames, flip chip on substrates and micro electromechanical systems; pillar bump components, namely, wafer level chips skill package and micro electromechanical systems; integrated circuit interconnect components, namely, chip on chip components for micro electromechanical systems | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Custom manufacture of bumps, namely conductive material, including copper, on an integrated circuit or semiconductor wafter; custom semiconductor bumping services; custom electroplating of conductive material on integrated circuits or semiconductor wafers; custom pillar bumping services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Advanpack Solutions Pte Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Advanpack Solutions Pte Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Similar marks named CU.P BUMP
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 26, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 26, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 7, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 14, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 25, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 2, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 14, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 2, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 2, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 15, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 30, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 24, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 6, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 6, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 6, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 6, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 29, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 29, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 26, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |