USPTO serial 76361014
VIVIENNE TAM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GEARIN, AMY
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VIVIENNE TAM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jennifer D. Silverman, Esq.
Jennifer D. Silverman, Esq. Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLP150 East 42nd Street, 11th FloorNew York, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetics, cosmetic preparations for the skin and body, namely, non-medicated skin care preparations; hair care preparations, namely, hair gels, hair mousse, shampoos, conditioners, hair dyes, permanent hair wave preparations, hair balms, hair creams, hair oils; perfumery, perfumes, namely, colognes, eau de cologne, eau de perfume, eau de toilette, perfume; face creams, facial lotions, moisturizers, namely, skin moisturizer, moisturizing hand cream, skin moisturizer masks; face gels, skin care products namely, non-medicated skin serum; eye creams, eye gels, face exfoliators, face cleansers, foundation, face powder, rouge, lipsticks, mascaras, lip gloss, lip liners, eyeliners, eye shadows, facial toners; body gels, body lotions, body creams, body exfoliators, body shampoos and soaps, talcum powders, hand creams, hand lotions, foot creams, foot lotions, nail polish, nail and cuticle protector, namely, nail hardeners, nail strengtheners, cuticle conditioners and cuticle creams; sun block lotion, sun tan lotions, self-tanning lotions, after-sun creams, sun tan oils, deodorants, antiperspirants, hair removal lotion and wax | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 17, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 14, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 14, 2007 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 28, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 28, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 5, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 17, 2006 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 27, 2006 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2006 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 31, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 31, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 23, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 21, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 4, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 4, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 22, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 22, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 1, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 1, 2004 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 12, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2004 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 12, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 25, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 2, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 2, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 30, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 10, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 4, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 31, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 11, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 26, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 26, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 24, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 18, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 16, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 7, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |