Drawing for CHI

USPTO serial 76361091

CHI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RIRIE, VERNA BETH
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CHI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Air purifying units and ionizers for commercial and domestic useACTIVE—
016News letters in the field of health, human wellness and vitality, but specifically excluding the field of hospice careACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 8, 2005MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 4, 2005ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 4, 2005EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 25, 2005EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Feb 10, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 10, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 5, 2004CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Nov 4, 2004CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Oct 27, 2004WOAGWITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED—
Oct 27, 2004WOARTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED—
Sep 9, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 3, 2004JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 20, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 10, 2004EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 3, 2004EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Sep 22, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 15, 2003UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 7, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 28, 2003GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 26, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 5, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 4, 2003DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Nov 25, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 28, 2002DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Oct 28, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 28, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 23, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 5, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance