USPTO serial 76361206
BIO MICROBE MASK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STIGLITZ, SUSAN R
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BIO MICROBE MASK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph Fischer
JOSEPH FISCHER VAN DYKE & ASSOCIATES PA722 LAKE ELLENOR DR STE 252ORLANDO, FL 32809UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Protective masks for military and civilian use, namely, face masks protective against chemical and/or biological hazards, protective masks being worn over the mouth, nose or entire face, protective masks featuring a coating including a pharmaceutical agent that blocks and/or inactivates biological agents and/or chemical agents, or featuring an intrinsically absorbent bacteriocidal dressing and/or other component that blocks and/or inactivates biological warfare agents and/or chemical warfare agents | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 30, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 24, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 27, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| May 13, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |