Drawing for ROCK PILE VINEYARDS & WINERY

USPTO serial 76361571

ROCK PILE VINEYARDS & WINERY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3051290Status 711
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 24, 2006
Examiner
BATTLE, KENNETH
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ROCK PILE VINEYARDS & WINERY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark J. Freed

MARK J FREED50 OLD COURTHOUSE SQ STE 401SANTA ROSA, CA 95404UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033WineSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLEDMay 1, 2005

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 13, 2006C7..CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL—
Oct 16, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 20, 2006C7RFREQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED—
Jul 20, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 24, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 8, 2005REGVLAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 25, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 21, 2005CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Jun 3, 2005SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jun 3, 2005IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jun 3, 2005EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Nov 29, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Nov 29, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Nov 29, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 18, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 11, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 7, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 7, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 17, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 8, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 8, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 30, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 3, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 3, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 10, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 17, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 28, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 14, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 20, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 20, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 23, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 19, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 15, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance