Drawing for GIA

USPTO serial 76361745

GIA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ALI, STEPHANIE MARIE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GIA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Douglas W. Kenyon

DOUGLAS W KENYON HUNTON & WILLIAMSPOST OFFICE BOX 109RALEIGH, NC 27602UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016PRINTED MATERIALS, NAMELY, MAGAZINES, NEWSLETTERS, NEWSPAPERS, AND PAMPHLETS IN THE FIELD OF GLOBAL INTERNET COMMUNICATIONSACTIVE—
035ADVERTISING SERVICES, NAMELY PROMOTING THE SERVICES OF INTERNET SERVICE PROVIDERS IN THE FIELD OF GLOBAL INTERNET COMMUNICATIONSACTIVE—
038Providing on-line forums for transmission of messages and electronic mailing among Internet service providers to collect and disseminate information concerning technical, business and market issues related to the global computer networks, design, production and maintenance of computer programs used by Internet service providers; telecommunication services, namely, arranging and hosting telephone conferences for Internet services providers to discuss and disseminate information on technical, business and market issues related to global computer networks, design, production and maintenance of computer programs used by Internet service providersACTIVE—
041Providing continuing education in the field of communication and telecommunication to Internet service providers by hosting meetings to collect and disseminate information concerning technical, business and market issues related to the global computer networks, design, production and maintenance of computer programs used by Internet service providersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 20, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 20, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 5, 2006EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Oct 5, 2006EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Oct 5, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 4, 2006EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Apr 4, 2006EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Apr 4, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 23, 2005EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Sep 15, 2005EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Sep 15, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 4, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 4, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 4, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 8, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 12, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 12, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 23, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 6, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 25, 2003ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jul 15, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 25, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 2, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 28, 2003CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Apr 25, 2003RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Feb 12, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 12, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 28, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 13, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 13, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 10, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 9, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance