Drawing for SAMPSON

USPTO serial 76362033

SAMPSON

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GOLD, BARBARA
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SAMPSON?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark D. Engelmann

MARK D ENGELMANN FROSS ZELNICK LEHRNAN & ZISSU, PC866 UNITED NATIONS PLZNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
014watchesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 11, 2007MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
May 11, 2007ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
May 10, 2007EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Apr 9, 2007CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 7, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 29, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 25, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 15, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 10, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 19, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 19, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Oct 22, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 17, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 27, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 27, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 6, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 1, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance