USPTO serial 76362233
REMBRANDT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 7, 2005
- Examiner
- COFIELD, JULIA
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with REMBRANDT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
WILMINGTON, DE, US
Bala Cynwyd, PA, US
WILMINGTON, DE, US
Palo Alto, CA, US
Palo Alto, CA, US
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Licensing of Intellectual Property | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by REMBRANDT IP FUND, LLLP
- Other trademarks owned by REMBRANDT IP MANAGEMENT, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by REMBRANDT IP FUND, LLLP
- Other trademarks owned by Rappaport, Irving S.
- Other trademarks owned by Rappaport, Irving S.
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named REMBRANDT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 2026 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jun 7, 2024 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2016 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2016 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Apr 29, 2016 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Apr 25, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 25, 2016 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Apr 25, 2016 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Apr 14, 2016 | ERTI | TEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION INQUIRY LETTER | — |
| Apr 11, 2016 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Apr 5, 2016 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Feb 10, 2016 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 1, 2016 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2016 | C8.T | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR) | — |
| Jun 25, 2015 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Jun 23, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 2, 2015 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| May 18, 2011 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| May 18, 2011 | FIXD | ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 21, 2010 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 30, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 14, 2010 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 30, 2010 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Apr 6, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 5, 2010 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 2, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 2, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 29, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 7, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 4, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 23, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 26, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 25, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 14, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 17, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 17, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 17, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 14, 2003 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 28, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 8, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 12, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 9, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 9, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 12, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |