USPTO serial 76362392
ARMADILLO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DEFORD, JEFFREY S
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ARMADILLO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark B. Harrison
MARK B HARRISON VENABLEP O BOX 343851201 NEW YORK AVE N WWASHINGTON, DC 20043-9998Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION OF ACCESS CONTROL, ENCRYPTION, FIREWALL, SECURE ELECTRONIC COMMERCE AND VIRUS PROTECTION SOFTWARE SYSTEMS | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | MONITORING COMPUTER SYSTEMS OF OTHERS FOR SECURITY PURPOSES AND COMPUTER SECURITY MANAGEMENT SERVICES, NAMELY PROVIDING PROTECTION AND SECURITY FOR ELECTRONIC INFORMATION BY PROVIDING INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL SECURITY ASSESSMENTS, DIGITAL CERTIFICATES, SECURING WEB SITES VIA SECURED SOCKETS LAYER TECHNOLOGY, VIRTUAL PRIVATE NETWORKS AND OTHER REMOTE ACCESS TECHNOLOGIES, INTRUSION DETECTION AND INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL PENETRATION TESTS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 7, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 3, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 29, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 19, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 17, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 24, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 24, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 1, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 11, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 15, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 18, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 3, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |