USPTO serial 76362458
SEMENESIS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARROLL, DORITT
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SEMENESIS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Sainte-Foy, Quebec G1V 3V9, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas W. Brooke
THOMAS W BROOKE HOLLAND & KNIGHT, LLP2099 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NWSTE 100WASHINGTON, DC 20006-6801Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Biopharmaceutical and bioengineered preparations for human and animal use containing recombinant, transgenic or other synthetic equivalents thereto for use in the treatment of cancer,cardiovascular diseases, gastro-intestinal diseases,reproductive system diseases, infectious diseases, immunologic diseases, inflammatory diseases, blood-related diseases and genetic diseases | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Production for others of recombinant protein products using transgenic animals | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 9, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 9, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 9, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 14, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 9, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 8, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2003 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 11, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 11, 2002 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 11, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 22, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 3, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 29, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 11, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |