Drawing for IRM

USPTO serial 76362857

IRM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 607
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SAITO, KIM
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with IRM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert W. Mulcahy

ROBERT W MULCAHY APPLIED MATERIALS, INC2881 SCOTT BLVD M/S 2061SANTA CLARA, CA 95054UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Semiconductor wafer processing equipment for the processing and production of semiconductor substrates, thin films, silicon discs and wafers; namely, epitaxial reactors, chemical vapor deposition reactors, physical vapor deposition reactors, plasma etchers, ion implanters, thin film monitoring tools, and chemical mechanical polishersACTIVEMar 21, 2004

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 7, 2005MAB7ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT—
Feb 6, 2005ABN7ABANDONMENT - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT—
Jul 1, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 23, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 15, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 4, 2004SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jun 4, 2004IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jun 4, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 29, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 11, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 11, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 17, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 25, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 5, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 16, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 30, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 30, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 18, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 7, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 2, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance