USPTO serial 76362900
FIVE REGIONS OF THE FUTURE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEE, DOUGLAS
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FIVE REGIONS OF THE FUTURE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
N. Paul Friederichs III
N PAUL FRIEDERICHS III ANGENEHM LAW FIRM, LTDP O BOX 48755COON RAPIDS, MN 55448-0755UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Pre-recorded videotapes featuring topics in futuristic thinking and computer software featuring simulation games | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Toys, namely, board games concerning futuristic thinking; simulation board games concerning futuristic thinking; baby multiple activity toys; crib toys; bath toys; bendable toys; children multiple activity toys; children's wire construction and art activity toys; construction toys; drawing toys; stuffed, mechanical, battery and electrical action toys; disc toss toys; fantasy character toys; flying saucer toys; pet toys | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Barker, Joel A.
- Other trademarks owned by Barker, Joel A.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named FIVE REGIONS OF THE FUTURE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 2004 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 29, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 10, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 25, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 25, 2003 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 8, 2003 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 25, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 25, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 3, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 13, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 1, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 19, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 19, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 13, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |