USPTO serial 76362967
MX TECHNOLOGY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PENDLETON, CAROLYN A
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MX TECHNOLOGY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Berkshire RG40 2QE, GB
Berkshire RG40 2QE, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark D. Engelmann
MARK D ENGELMANN FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU, PC866 UNITED NATIONS PLZNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Fire, safety and security detection, prevention and suppression apparatus and equipment, specifically detecting apparatus, namely fire alarm control panels (FACP), carbon monoxide, optical smoke and temperature detectors, smoke alarms, fire alarms, loop protocols, repeaters, battery and expansion boxes, call points, fire and safety detection instruments, namely, conventional and addressable fire detectors, power supplies, fuse boards, transmission devices, namely, digital and serial alarm communicating transmitters (DACT), control input/output, sounder, booster, notification, timer and display modules, gateway apparatuses, namely, fire alarm control panel network interfaces, annunciators, sensing probes, call points and pull stations, voltage relays, and service and repair equipment therefor, namely, fire alarm control panel software service tools and fire detector testing and calibration tools; all for use in the field of fire, safety and security detection, prevention and suppression | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 10, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 10, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 9, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 29, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 11, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 7, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 4, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 3, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 30, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 5, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 20, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 26, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 5, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 3, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 10, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 20, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 8, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 3, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 31, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 31, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 20, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |