Drawing for DR. SEARS ZONE DIET

USPTO serial 76363075

DR. SEARS ZONE DIET

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GAST, PAUL
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DR. SEARS ZONE DIET?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DEBORAH L BENSON

DEBORAH L BENSON HINCKLEY ALLEN & SNYDER LLP28 STATE STBOSTON, MA 02109-1775UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003NON-MEDICATED SKIN CARE PREPARATIONS AND COSMETICSACTIVE—
005VITAMINS AND NUTRITIONAL SUPPLEMENTS; NUTRITIONAL FOOD BARS; MEDICATED COSMETICSACTIVE—
009ELECTRONIC PUBLICATIONS, NAMELY, MAGAZINES, A SERIES OF BOOKS, NEWSLETTERS, BULLETINS, NOTICES AND ADVERTISEMENTS IN THE FIELDS OF DIET, HEALTH AND NUTRITION RECORDED ON COMPUTER MEDIA, NAMELY, COMPUTER DISCS AND CD'SACTIVE—
016PRINTED MATERIALS, NAMELY NEWSLETTERS, MAGAZINES, AND A SERIES OF BOOKS, ALL IN THE FIELD OF DIET, HEALTH AND NUTRITIONACTIVE—
029PREPARED ENTREES CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF MEAT, FISH, POULTRY, OR VEGETABLE; EDIBLE OILS AND FATSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 4, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 4, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 17, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 15, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
May 25, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 5, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 6, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 4, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 4, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Nov 24, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 25, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Sep 4, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 4, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 4, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 16, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 16, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 7, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 12, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 24, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 20, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 10, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance