USPTO serial 76363209
HIREK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 7, 2006
- Examiner
- KEAM, ALEX S
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with HIREK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
MALNATE (VARESE), IT
33100 Udine, IT
33100 Udine, IT
33100 Udine, IT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
STEWART BELLUS
STEWART BELLUS BUCKNAM AND ARCHER1077 NORTHERN BLVDROSLYN, NY 11576-1696UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | [ NONMETALLIC ROOF COVERINGS, NAMELY, ROOF TILES, ROOF BENT-TILES, SHINGLES; NON-METAL WINDOW FRAMES, NON-METAL DOOR FRAMES ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 020 | FURNITURE, FRAMEWORKS, NAMELY, FURNITURE FRAMES, EMBROIDERY FRAMES, PICTURE FRAMES, FURNITURE PANELS, CHAIRS [ AD ] * and * SEATS FOR HOME, OFFICE AND COMMUNITY | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by DIBI S.R.L.
- Other trademarks owned by ELMA CHEMICALS S.R.L.
- Other trademarks owned by ELMA CHEMICALS S.R.L.
- Other trademarks owned by ELMA CHEMICALS S.R.L.
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Similar marks named HIREK
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 9, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Sep 28, 2012 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2012 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2012 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 7, 2012 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 16, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 1, 2006 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 23, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 7, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 15, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 26, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 29, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 23, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 21, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 20, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 12, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 12, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 5, 2005 | CEPE | COMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Aug 5, 2005 | CEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2005 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 3, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 13, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 13, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 1, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 17, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 29, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 19, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 2, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 2, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 5, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 5, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 2, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 17, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 21, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 23, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 16, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |