USPTO serial 76363221
COMPLETE HOME
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JOHNSON, AISHA CLARKE
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with COMPLETE HOME?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Jacksonville, FL
Jacksonville, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas C. Saitta
THOMAS C SAITTA ROGERS TOWERS BAILEY JONES & GAY, PA1301 RIVERPLACE BLVD STE 1500JACKSONVILLE, FL 32207UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Installation of security systems, computer networks, telephone systems, theater systems and automation systems in residential and commercial buildings | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 31, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 31, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 31, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 31, 2005 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 17, 2004 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 20, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 31, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 31, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 2, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 4, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 6, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 3, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 2, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 17, 2003 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jan 13, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 13, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 27, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 24, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |